[2.2.3] Observations about the Stoic, Conventionalist, Naturalist and Aristotelian Views on Language

A. L. Komáromi

In posts [2.2.2], [1.2.3] and [1.3.3] I proposed OntoUML diagrams for some aspects on the Stoic, Conventionalist, Naturalist and Aristotelian language models.
Here are some thoughts about the main differences and similitudes:

  • Both the Aristotelian and the Stoic models include the Mind in their model, using concepts like Mental State and Sayable; while the Conventionalist and Naturalists are not.
  • The Aristotelian model’s originality consists in the fact that there is no direct relation between the Word and the Object, (as it is in all the others). The relation among these two classes is realized by the Mind.
  • The Stoic model is more about propositions (represented by the Signifier), while the others about Words/Names.

First published: 22/03/2019

5 thoughts on “[2.2.3] Observations about the Stoic, Conventionalist, Naturalist and Aristotelian Views on Language”

  1. Pingback: [2.2.8] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/GUFO model – Philosophy Models
  2. Pingback: [2.2.8] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/GUFO model – Philosophy Models
  3. Pingback: [2.2.9] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/GUFO model – Philosophy Models
  4. Pingback: [2.2.9] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/BFO model – Philosophy Models
  5. Pingback: [2.2.9] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/BFO model – Philosophy Models

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.