Greek

[2.2.9] Some Aspects of the Stoic Philosophy Presented in OWL/BFO model

A. L. KomáromiLeave a comment

The  OWL/BFO  model below:

Ontology Source (OWL): stoic-bfo.owl contains the Classes and ObjectProperites from the following posts:

[2.2.1] The Stoic Sage’s Mind
[2.2.2] Stoic Philosophy of Language
[2.2.4] Ontological Structure of Stoic Logic
[2.2.5] Stoic Ontology, Genus, Categories
[2.2.6] Stoic Cosmology
[2.2.7] Virtue, Vice and Indifferent in Stoic Ethics

After downloading, you can open the model with Protégé.

The following Protegé screenshot presents a sequence of the model distributed here:

Rights: This work is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0

First published: 14/11/2022

[2.2.3] Observations about the Stoic, Conventionalist, Naturalist and Aristotelian Views on Language

A. L. Komáromi5 Comments

In posts [2.2.2], [1.2.3] and [1.3.3] I proposed OntoUML diagrams for some aspects on the Stoic, Conventionalist, Naturalist and Aristotelian language models.
Here are some thoughts about the main differences and similitudes:

  • Both the Aristotelian and the Stoic models include the Mind in their model, using concepts like Mental State and Sayable; while the Conventionalist and Naturalists are not.
  • The Aristotelian model’s originality consists in the fact that there is no direct relation between the Word and the Object, (as it is in all the others). The relation among these two classes is realized by the Mind.
  • The Stoic model is more about propositions (represented by the Signifier), while the others about Words/Names.

First published: 22/03/2019