[2.2.6] Stoic Cosmology

For the Stoics, the universe:

  • is a unitary spherical body located in the void, with properties resembling those of a living being,
  • can be entirely explained by two principles, the active pneuma and the passive matter,
  • has a life cycle consisting of three ever-repeating phases, characterized by the dominance of fire (conflagration), of elements, and of bodies (in the present period).

The stoic cosmological model is using concepts from stoic ontology [2.2.5] and psychology [2.2.1].

The OntoUML diagram below presents the structure of the stoic universe:

Stoic cosmology
ClassDescriptionRelations
Universe“The governing metaphor for Stoic cosmology is biological, in contrast to the fundamentally mechanical conception of the Epicureans. The entire cosmos [universe] is a living thing and God stands to the cosmos as an animal’s life force stands to the animal’s body, enlivening, moving and directing it by its presence throughout. The Stoics insistence that only bodies are capable of causing anything, however, guarantees that this cosmic life force must be conceived of as somehow corporeal.”
UniversOnFire;
UnverseOfElements;
PresentUniverse
“Just as living things have a life-cycle that is witnessed in parents and then again in their off-spring, so too the universe has a life cycle that is repeated. This life cycle is guided by, or equivalent to, a developmental plan that is identified with God. There is a cycle of endless recurrence, beginning from a state in which all is fire, through the generation of the elements, to the creation of the world we are familiar with, and eventually back to the state of pure designing fire called the conflagration’” UniversOnFire,
UnverseOfElements,
PresentUniverse,
are all phases of Universe
PneumaGod is identified with an eternal reason or intelligent designing fire or a breath (pneuma) which structures matter in accordance with Its plan. The designing fire is likened to sperm or seed which contains the first principles or directions of all the things which will subsequently develop. The biological conception of God as a kind of living heat or seed from which things grow seems to be fully intended. The further identification of God with pneuma or breath may have its origins in medical theories of the Hellenistic period…
More specifically, God is identical with one of the two ungenerated and indestructible first principles (archai) of the universe.”
contained in the PresentUniverse
Tenor;
Nature;
Soul;
CentralCommandingFaculty
Pneuma comes in gradations and endows the bodies which it pervades with different qualities as a result. The pneuma which sustains an inanimate object is a tenor (hexis, lit. a holding). Pneuma in plants is, in addition, physique (phusis, lit. nature). In animals, pneuma is soul (psychê) and in rational animals pneuma is, besides, the [central] commanding faculty (hêgemonikon) – that is responsible for thinking, planning, deciding. The Stoics assign to ‘physique’ or ‘nature’ all the purely physiological life functions of a human animal (such as digestion, breathing, growth etc.) – self-movement from place to place is due to soul. Tenor, Nature, Soul,
CentralCommandingFaculty are subkinds of Pneuma;
Tenor is contained in the Body;
Nature is contained in the Plant, Animal and Human;
Soul is contained in Animal and Human;
CentralCommandingFaculty is contained in Human
Matter “One principle [of the Universe] is matter which they regard as utterly unqualified and inert. It is that which is acted upon.” is contained by the Universe and Body
Body “Only bodies (σώματα, sômata) have being, or exist. Slogan: to exist is to have causal powers. Plato in the Sophist (247d–e): ‘Now, I say that what has some power to make something else into something, or to suffer the slightest, even once, this has real being. For I define being as nothing but power (δύναμις).’ The Stoic conception of existence is thus dynamic. Matter as such is passive, but bodies are not, since they are also infused by logos, which is active… only bodies can act or be acted upon” is part of the PresentUniverse
Inanimate object;
Plant;
Animal;
Human
these are BodiesInanimate object,
Plant, Animal,
Human subkinds of Body
ElementElements are continuous, infinitely divisible substancesis part of Matter;
is contained by UnverseOfElements
Fire; Earth; Water; AirFire, Earth, Water; Air are subkinds of Element;
Fire is contained by Universe in Fire

Sources

  • All citations from: Baltzly, Dirk, “Stoicism”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
  • Suzanne Bobizen, Early Stoic Determinism, Presses Universitaires de France | Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 2005/4 – n° 48

First published: 28/11/2019
Updated: 20/1/2022

[2.2.5] Stoic Ontology, Genus, Categories

“An examination of Stoic ontology might profitably begin with a passage from Plato’s Sophist. There, Plato asks for a mark or indication of what is real or what has being. One answer which is mooted is that the capacity to act or be acted upon is the distinctive mark of real existence or ‘that which is.’ The Stoics accept this criterion and add the rider that only bodies can act or be acted upon. Thus, only bodies exist. So there is a sense in which the Stoics are materialists or – perhaps more accurately, given their understanding of matter as the passive principle (see below) – ‘corporealists’. However, they also hold that there are other ways of appearing in the complete inventory of the world than by virtue of existing. Incorporeal things like time, place or sayables (lekta, see below) are ‘subsistent’ – as are imaginary things like centaurs.”

In this diagram I used OntoUML notation to present the main concepts of Stoic ontology:

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comment texts from Stoic Ontology from Peter Wyss.
ClassDescriptionRelations
Something“This is the highest ontological genus: to be something (τί, ti) is to be some particular thing. Notably, this excludes Platonic Forms, or universals: they are not-somethings (outina), and thus ontological outcasts.” generalizes: Incorporeal; Body; Neither
Incorporeal“These do not exist, but subsist (ὑφεστάναι, hyphestanai); yet they are real (ὑπάρχειν, hyparchein). We can think of them as conditions ‘without which the interaction of bodies in the world would neither be analysable nor intelligible” generalizes: Sayable; Void; Place; Time
Place; Time; SayablePlace, time, sayabl are incorporeals.Place; Time; Sayable are subkidns of Incorporeal
Body“Only bodies (σώματα, sômata) have being, or exist. Slogan: to exist is to have causal powers. Plato in the Sophist (247d–e): ‘Now, I say that what has some power to make something else into something, or to suffer the slightest, even once, this has real being. For I define being as nothing but power (δύναμις).’ The Stoic conception of existence is thus dynamic. Matter as such is passive, but bodies are not, since they are also infused by logos, which is active… only bodies can act or be acted upon ”
Neither can be: fictional entities (e.g. unicorns); limitsgeneralizes: FictionalEntity; Limit
ObjectSubstrate“A dog as merely an object, something ‘out there’, a discrete portion of matter: a substance (οὐσία, ousia). As object, a dog is merely the potential bearer of qualities” component of Body; subkind of Body
DisposedA dog as a further differentiated qualified thing: as running, barking, brave. characterizes Body
Qualified“A dog as an object with certain qualities: bad breath, soft fur, dotted; can be qualified commonly as ‘dog’ or ‘furry’, or peculiarly as ‘Fido’.”associated with Body, one to zero or many multiplicity
RelativelyDisposed“A dog as an object in relation to other objects as owned by Jack, Rexs’ father winner at Crufts”mediates Body and Other Body
OtherBodythe reference body of relatively disposed, e.g. Jack; father role of Body

Sources:

  • All citations from: Peter Wyss, “Stoic Ontology
  • Baltzly, Dirk, “Stoicism“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
  • Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N. (1987). “The Hellenistic Philosophers”, Vol. 1 (p. 163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

First published: 6/3/2019
Updated: 15/1/2022
Updated: 21/2/2022