[1.2.2] Plato on the Soul

Plato (429?-347 BC) in Book 4 of the Republic presents a theory, which states that the human soul has three main parts: reason, spirit, and appetite.
In Book 5 he maps the objects of the Intelligible and Visible realms known from the Two World Theory to different subordinated faculties of the soul, faculties, which are aimed to handle these objects.

FacultyRealmObject
REASON (logos)Intelligible (high)Knowledge, forms – grasped with the help of recollection and the lower-level faculties
THINKING (dianoia) Intelligible (low)Hypothesis, scientific knowledge
BELIEF (pistis) Visible (high) Ordinary physical objects
IMAGINATION (phantasia) Visible (low) Images, shadows of ordinary physical objects

The following UML Use Case diagram shows the main concepts in Plato’s philosophy of mind – as presented in different works:

Plato on soul

Use cases:

FacultyUse CaseRelations
SENSE PERCEPTIONSENSE PERCEPTION gets information about ordinary objects (particulars) (UC1):Perception, unlike discursive thought or belief, is aligned not with the so-called rational part of the soul, but with the desiderative part…, the senses are disparaged as a source of confusion and falsehood. The senses mislead us.” The cause of this misleading is the fact that we perceive particulars, ordinary material objects, not Forms.”
APPETITEAPPETITE (epithumêtikon) gives rise to desire for instant gratification through food, drink, sex…(UC2): “Appetite is primarily concerned with food, drink and sex (439d, 580e). It gives rise to desires for these and other such things which in each case are based, simply and immediately, on the thought that obtaining the relevant object of desire is, or would be, pleasant. Socrates also calls appetite the money-loving part, because, in the case of mature human beings at least, appetite also tends to be strongly attached to money, given that it is most of all by means of money that its primary desires are fulfilled.”includes UC1
SPIRIT SPIRIT aiming/motivating for esteem by others (UC3): “The natural attachment of spirit [thumoeides] is to honor and, more generally, to recognition and esteem by others. As a motivating force it generally accounts for self-assertion and ambition.”
REASONUse REASON (logos) to generate Knowledge (nous) (UC4):Reason is the part of the soul that is, of its own nature, attached to knowledge and truth. It is also, however, concerned to guide and regulate the life that it is, or anyhow should be, in charge of, ideally in a way that is informed by wisdom and that takes into consideration the concerns both of each of the three parts separately and of the soul as a whole.”includes UC2, UC3, UC5, UC6, UC7, UC8
IMAGINATIONUse IMAGINATION (eikasia) to grasp images (UC5): “there is the intelligible realm and the visible realm… At the bottom of the visible one finds images, shadows and such. Set over the images is the faculty of eikasia, imagination.”
BELIEFUse BELIEF (pistis) to grasp properties of ordinary objects (UC6): “there is the intelligible realm and the visible realm… The ordinary physical objects of which the images are images occupy the upper portion. Set over the physical world is the faculty of pistis, literally faith or conviction, but generally regarded as belief.
THINKING Generate hypothesis through THINKING (dianoia) (UC7): “A critical question then is how one obtains the appropriate kind of justification to tie down or convert a belief into knowledge. Plato offers little in the way of detail on this score, but twice he alludes to a method of hypothesis, suggesting both in the Phaedo and Republic that hypotheses and their ultimately being rendered ‘non-hypothetical’ is part of the process by which one comes to know a Form.”
RECOLLECTIONRECOLLECTION of what it once grasped of the forms (UC8):recollection… our disembodied, immortal souls have seen the Forms prior to their incarceration in the body. If Forms are the (basic) objects of knowledge, and Forms are not in the physical world, then we must have acquired that knowledge at some point prior to our commerce with that world.”

Actors:

ACTORDESCRIPTIONRELATIONS
Object in External World.A material object in the external world.in relation with UC1
Form(Platonic)Platonic form (see [1.2.1])in relation with UC7
User of the soulA human person.uses UC4

The following OntoUML diagram presents the main classes in Plato’s theory of soul:

Plato’s theory of soul

Sources:

First published: 10/1/2019
Updated: 13/6/2021
Updated: 6/11/2021 – added OntoUML diagram

[1.2.1] Plato: Theory of Forms

“What many things have in common, or a feature they share, is a universal or, in Plato’s terms, a Form. Of course there seems to be a huge number of properties. Many different things are white. Many different things are animals. Each (shared) property is a universal—a ‘one over many instances,’ whiteness over the many white things, roundness over the many round things, and so on. Thus, for Plato, Roundness and Whiteness are Forms.”
This theory is the first known theory of Universals.

The following OntoUML  Class Diagram shows the main elements of Plato’s (429?-347 BC) theory of forms:

Plato’s theory of forms
ClassDescriptionRelations
Form“What many things have in common, or a feature they share, is a universal or, in Plato’s terms, a Form. Of course there seems to be a huge number of properties. Many different things are white. Many different things are animals. Each (shared) property is a universal—a ‘one over many instances,’ whiteness over the many white things, roundness over the many round things, and so on. Thus, for Plato, Roundness and Whiteness are Forms. […] Forms are immaterial, non-spatial and atemporal […] Forms are […] perfect and what particulars strive to be like but fall short of . […] Forms are simple or incomposite, of one form (monoeidetic). Forms are the objects of knowledge, grasped by the intellect through definitions. […] Forms are pure, simple or uniform (monoeidetic , hen).is being Essence; componentOf Particular
Good“[…] all Forms are related to the Good. […] each Form is good, that is, that each Form is a good thing or is characterized by goodness.” characterizes Form
Essence“Each Form is its essence (ousia), which is to say that the relation of Being links the essence of beauty to the subject, Beauty itself. Being, then, is a primitive ontological relation designed exclusively to capture the special tie between that which possesses an essence and the essence possessed.”
BeingBeing, then, is a primitive ontological relation designed exclusively to capture the special tie between that which possesses an essence and the essence possessed.” relates Essence with Form
ParticularParticulars are dependent on Forms whereas Forms are not dependent on them. Particulars strive to be such as the Forms are and thus in comparison to Forms are imperfect or deficient treat Partaking as a relation between material particulars and Forms, the result of which is that the particular is characterized by the Form of which it partakes […].” partakes in Form

Related posts in theory of Universals: [1.2.2][1.3.1][1.3.2][2.5][2.7.3][4.3.1][4.3.2][4.4.1][4.5.2][4.9.8][4.11], [4.15.6], [4.18.8]

The source of all citations and more about the topic in: Silverman, Allan, “Plato’s Middle Period Metaphysics and Epistemology“, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)

First published: 9/1/2019

Updated: 6/2/2019: changed relationship type of Form-Particular
Updated: 18/9/2021: added being, and OntoUML notation