[3.3.4] Ibn Sina on the Phases of Intellect

Ibn Sina (Avicenna, 980-1037 AD) thinks that the human Intellect goes through a series of four phases – starting from the empty potentiality of a newborn to the fully actualized intellectual faculty containing Forms acquired from the Active Intellect (see also [3.3.2], [3.3.3] and al-Farabi’s similar structure [3.2.4]).

The following OntoUML diagram shows the four phases of the Intellect:

Ibn Sina on Stages of Intellect
ClassDescriptionRelations
HumanIntellectIntellect is acquiring concepts/forms through actualization from Active Intellect.
Material
Intellect
“‘Material intellect‘ is the wholly ‘unqualified potentiality’ for thought which belongs to ‘every member of the species.’ It is a ‘disposition’ (isticdad) inhering in the incorporeal human soul from birth.”
E.g. “The newborn infant has the potentiality for writing only in the sense that it may eventually learn to write.”
phase of Intellect
Intellect
InHabitu
“‘Intellect in habitu(bil-malaka) is the ‘possible potentiality’ in which the human subject possesses the ‘first intelligible thoughts.’ These are attained through cogitation.
E.g. “Later, the ‘boy matures’ and comes to ‘know the inkwell, the pen, and the letters.’ Inasmuch as he controls the rudiments and can go on to master the art with ‘no intermediate’ step, he is said to have a ‘possible potentiality’ for writing.”
phase of Intellect; posesses FirstInteligible
Actual
Intellect
“‘Actual intellect, despite the name, is a further stage of potentiality— the stage of fully actualized potentiality. It is the ‘complete [kamdliyya] potentiality’ that is attained when both ‘second intelligibles'[derivative scientific
propositions] and ‘intelligible forms’—that is to say, derivative propositions and concepts—have been added to the ‘first intelligibles,’ with the proviso that the human subject is not thinking the propositions and concepts. At the stage of actual intellect, the human subject does not ‘actually … attend to’ his knowledge, yet can do so ‘whenever he wishes.'”. These are attaied also with the help of cogitation.
phase of Intellect; posesses FirstInteligible and SecondIntelligible
Acquired
Intellect
“‘acquired [mustafdd] intellect,’ which alone is an ‘unqualified actuality.’ At the level of acquired intellect, ‘intelligible forms’ are actually ‘present’ to the man, and he ‘actually attends’ to them. Avicenna’s acquired intellect is, literally, acquired from the active intellect. The unqualified actuality of thought is ‘called. . . acquired, because it will be shown . . . that potential intellect passes to actuality’ by establishing contact with the active intellect and having ‘forms acquired from without imprinted’ in man’s intellect.”
E.g. “At a still higher level stands the ‘scribe,’ who is adept with the [writing] implement,’ is ‘accomplished in his art,’ and can apply the art ‘at will.’ When he is not exercising his skill, the scribe has a ‘perfect’ potentiality for writing.”
phase of Intellect; posesses FirstInteligible , SecondIntelligible and Form
Active
Intellect
“The active intellect is (1) the emanating cause of the matter of the sublunar world, (2) the emanating cause of natural forms appearing in matter, including the souls of plants, animals, and man, and (3) the cause of the actualization of the human intellect.”actualize Acquired
Intellect; emanates Form
Formnatural form of the lower worldexclusive part of ActiveIntellect; characterizes Intellect
FirstIntelligiblefirst intelligibles: “are theoretical propositions of the sort man affirms without being able to ‘suppose that they might ever not be affirmed’; examples are the propositions that ‘the whole is greater than the part’ and ‘things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.'”
SecondIntelligibleSecond intelligibles are derivative propositions and concepts.
IntelligibleFirst intelligibles, second intelligibles and forms are intelligibles.

Sources

  • All citations from:  Herbert A. Davidson, “Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect”, Oxford University Press 1992

First published: 22/08/2019
Updated: added first and second intelligible on 22/11/2020

[3.3.3] Ibn Sina on the Soul

Ibn Sina (Avicenna, 980-1037 AD) elaborates on the Soul in the book De anima of the Shifā or Healing, according to which:

  • The Soul is immaterial, separated from the body, however, linked to it.
  • Exterior and interior senses serve the Intellect as a source of knowledge, through a process of abstraction from sense perception.
  • Knowledge – Forms – is also received from the Active Intellect

The following UML Use Case diagram presents the main concepts in Avicenna’s theory of the human soul, strongly related with his Cosmology (see [3.3.2]), and Aristotle’s Psychology (see [1.3.6]):

Avicenna on the soul
FacultyUse CaseRelations
EXTERNAL SENSESUse TASTE, TOUCH, SMELL, HEAR, SEE perception: are shared by non-rational and rational animals. impressed by Object in External World
COMMON SENSE (receptive)
(al-mushtarak)
(Use COMMON SENSE to) unify and monitor 5 senses, present in animals also.Includes all 5 extenal senses
RETENTIVE IMAGINATION (retentive)
(al-khayyāl/ al-mutasawwira)
(RETENTIVE IMAGINATION) retains sensible images provided by the External Senses and Common Sense.Includes “Use COMMON SENSE to) unify and monitor 5 senses”
ESTIMATION (receptive)
(wahm)
Instinctive sensing of intentions (is provided by ESTIMATION): “While the range of properties included under the rubric of estimative intentions appears to be quite broad, the most vivid and well-known examples that Avicenna gives are of affective qualities, such as the sheep‘s grasp of the fact that the wolf is her natural enemy, and her recognition of her offspring as an object of affection.”
Estimation is present in animals also.
Includes “Use COMMON SENSE to) unify and
MEMORY (retentive)
(ḏikr)
(MEMORY) stores intentions – whether of good or of evil.Includes “Instinctive sensing of intentions (is provided by ESTIMATION)”
COMPOSITIVE IMAGINATION (al-mutakhayyila) (COMPOSITIVE IMAGINATION) combines and divides sensible images and intentions, produces cogitation: “The compositive imagination is posited to account for the capacity to combine and divide sensible forms and images with estimative intentions without reference to the actual configuration of things in the external world, that is, without any stipulation that the external senses have previously been affected by such combinations. […] So it is necessary for there to be a faculty in us by which we do this, and this is the faculty which is called cogitative (mufakkirah) when the intellect employs it, and imaginative (mutaḫayyilah) when the animal faculty uses it.”
Compositive Imagination is present in animals also, but in humans – when controlled by the Intellect – produces cogitative thought. This, through the generalization of the images and intentions and using syllogisms, prepares the Intellect to receive forms from Agent Intellect through emanation/actualization.
Includes “(MEMORY) stores intentions”; Includes “(RETENTIVE IMAGINATION) retains sensible images”
INTELLECT (Actual INTELLECT) controls Compositive Imagination; produces derivative propositions and concepts through cogitation.Includes “(COMPOSITIVE IMAGINATION) combines and divides sensible images and intentions, produces cogitation”
INTELLECT(Acquired INTELLECT) receives concepts/forms through actualization from the Active Intellect: “…all new intelligibles must ultimately be explained with reference to a direct emanation from the Agent [Active] Intellect.”Extends “(Acquired INTELLECT) receives concepts/forms through actualization from the Active Intellect”;
Communicates with Active Intellect
Use Cases

ActorDescriptionRelations
Object in External WorldA sensible object in the external world.
Active IntellectActive (or agent) intellect is the last, tenth member of the chain of celestial intelligencies emenated by the First Pronciple (see [3.3.2]).
User of the SoulA human person.uses (Actual INTELLECT) controls Compositive Imagination; produces derivative propositions and concepts
Actors

Sources

  • All citations from: Black, Deborah, “Rational Imagination: Avicenna on the Cogitative Power”, University of Toronto
  • Gutas, Dimitri, “Ibn Sina [Avicenna]”The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
  • Herbert A. Davidson, “Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on Intellect”, Oxford University Press 1992

First published: 15/8/2019
Updated: added use case related to Acquired Intellect on 7/3/2021
Updated: added table with Actors 7/3/2021